Coronavirus

dinosaw said:
bigyetiman said:
For anyone who is wondering why Thurrock where I work is so rampant with it. Police were called to 1331 parties in the area New Years Eve which ranged from a rave in a church which was vandalised for the rave, a warehouse party with 1000 people in and a large house party with 100 people crammed in it.

You will be seeing this sort of stuff every week from now on, maybe not at the same scale but there will be enough people doing it to make the entertainment lockdown self defeating. It was clearly going on during the November lockdown which is presumably part of the reason why cases were rising in the South East even then. I think it was always going to be a big ask to expect the youngsters to live like monks for months on end. I can just about remember how slowly time seemed to pass when I was young.

I see they have announced plans for a huge entertainments complex just over the river from you BYM, they are calling it the UK's answer to Disneyland, or is that Disnaeland, as in disnae have a chance of being built.

The plans have been in for some time, under various guises. It is being built on a triple SSSI so has caused a lot of controversy which is still going on. For the people who live on the opposite side of the river in Essex which is about a mile wide, it will be a nightmare as the plans are for nightly fireworks at 11pm, and all noise from the from the place. Bet my boss has plans already submitted to run buses there. he doesn't miss a trick and we already go to Bluewater shopping centre in Kent. Not too mention the Lower Thames Crossing as well coming along
 
.
 

Attachments

  • EbS0sIHWoAAu7Kf.jpeg
    EbS0sIHWoAAu7Kf.jpeg
    122.1 KB · Views: 971
Here we go again...

I've got a good idea to help with the bills for furloughing employees. How about actually fining the people who breach the rules. £10,000 from each person who hosts a gathering & £1000 from each person who attends or who blatantly ignores the rules in other ways.
a) Idiots might start taking notice if it hits them in the wallet, &
b) the government can't pay with thin air for furlough & for tablets for underprivileged kids having to study at home.

It seems only fair that people who recklessly spread Covid should pay for the problems that they cause.
 
Im really worried! Not about the virus directly, although some people have a very bad reaction to it and I'm not making little of that at all, but the class of 2020 and maybe 2021 (I fear) will just be selected out by employers. Its short termism that worries me. There is a lot out there about how we bounced back from obscene national debt after the two world wars but we did it by burning oil. We cant do that again - even at all without a cost that makes this pandemic look like a couple of sneezes. I shouldn't be so pessimistic - Talking with our daughter-in-law (as near as counts), she related a story of how one of the bosses of their company was all for advertising that all of the waste was recycled as part of the service. She asked 'How is that going to happen?' - 'Details, details, we just say it.', 'Yeah, but I will be taking the calls when it all goes in the skip for landfill!' The positive thing in this is that the other boss told him he was being an idiot and the advert didn't go through. That's just an issue of honesty - it still ends up in the skip! But young people are the future that counts and that isn't where the power of short term invested interest resides...
 
You are spot on Rick. I could expand, but had better not. Fair to say that when the consequences of what we have done bites, and the reality of what we have achieved by it becomes clear, there will be a lot of angry (and jobless) young people about.
 
If you've done nothing wrong...........

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/05/singapore-says-police-will-be-given-access-to-covid-19-contact-tracing-data

And they wonder why conspiracy theorists find fertile ground.
 
Where do you find these pictures Marigold?! The perfect meme! :D
On the radio this morning there was a scientist - Prof Gupta (didn't catch her first name) who was really questioning if we would have been worse off shielding the vulnerable (now with a vaccine in the tool box) and letting it go in the wider population to reach 'herd immunity' faster. That phrase is really unfortunate - was never going to be a politically savvy stance. She also seemed to think that there are other ways to interpret the data than the new variant being 3 times more transmissible - who knows? - unless we read the published papers on the subject and pick apart the finer nuances of what is in the current science.
I do think that there has been a fair bit of political cherry picking of whatever snippet of 'the science' fits the mood along the way.
Anyway, I liked Prof Gupta - whether she was right or wrong she was frankly giving her honest, and directly informed, opinion which is brave and rare of late.
 
rick said:
Where do you find these pictures Marigold?! The perfect meme! :D
On the radio this morning there was a scientist - Prof Gupta (didn't catch her first name) who was really questioning if we would have been worse off shielding the vulnerable (now with a vaccine in the tool box) and letting it go in the wider population to reach 'herd immunity' faster. That phrase is really unfortunate - was never going to be a politically savvy stance. She also seemed to think that there are other ways to interpret the data than the new variant being 3 times more transmissible - who knows? - unless we read the published papers on the subject and pick apart the finer nuances of what is in the current science.
I do think that there has been a fair bit of political cherry picking of whatever snippet of 'the science' fits the mood along the way.
Anyway, I liked Prof Gupta - whether she was right or wrong she was frankly giving her honest, and directly informed, opinion which is brave and rare of late.

Sunetra Gupta one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, https://gbdeclaration.org

She and the 13,000 other medical and public health scientists who have signed it have been portrayed as dangerous cranks, despite having much greater expertise in the fields of epidemiology and virology than SAGE and most of the other bodies advising Western governments. Of course this is to be expected. When you embark on a policy that is clearly ruinous on many levels, then the only hope you have of not being damned for your actions is to present it as "the only way to save lives". To do that you must prevent any other course of action from being undertaken in case it does in fact save lives and exposes your previous statement as a fallacy. So we will be having lockdowns and lockdowns only as a solution because the reputations of Chris Whitty, Patrick Valance, Imperial, SAGE and most importantly, the government depend on it. Personally I'm not a huge fan of the herd immunity argument, but I do believe that shielding should be given a go in place of lockdown, lets face it a huge amount of people have already been doing just that.

Throughout the data has indeed been cherry picked to justify the measures. Here is a PHE graph of excess mortality from the past five years.

Deaths-201231-2.png

The large spike occurs in March of this year and coincides with the criminal policy of discharging covid patients into care homes causing 20,000 excess deaths. Beyond that the curve follows the pattern of previous years, with excess deaths this December not discernibly different from 2016 and 2017. You will notice that by March of both years, that excess deaths had dropped and curve smoothed. That occurred without a lockdown. This year, in March, they will show the graph for THIS YEAR ONLY, point out the rise in December, the fall through February and March and will proudly proclaim that it is the result of lockdown.

This graph shows deaths in Sweden this year versus their 5 year average.
image-19.png

You will notice they also have a large spike in March. They also allowed Covid to enter their care home system as we did. Those care home deaths account for almost all of the excess Covid deaths they suffered compared to their Scandinavian neighbours, who did a much better job of sealing off care homes from the virus.

As we know, Sweden was the one country in Europe that did not institute a lockdown, and yet, lo and behold their excess deaths fall away in the same way that ours, and every other nation in Europe did. It might be reasonable to suppose then, that it was not an organised national lockdown that brought the disease under control in the spring. What the Swedes did in fact do, was unofficially shield.

However, you may as well bark at the moon, what chance does hard data stand against slogans such as "save granny". I think we would all like to "save granny" but I think some of us would like to do it without bankrupting the country and cancelling cancer screening/treatment. It would be good to "save granny" without causing god knows what damage to mental health, depriving kids of an education and putting their parents out of work.

I think the most depressing thing has been the inaction of the media on probing the government. Only Talk Radio, which was briefly subject to censorship yesterday before youtube realised their folly, has probed the figures and the policy put forward by the government. Now we hear Chris Whitty telling us there will be restrictions next winter too and there are news reports circulating that say the South African variant of Covid may become vaccine resistant. All of the eggs have gone into the vaccine basket, but if this virus morphs every year like flu, then what?.

Boring essay/rant concluded for anyone who even made it this far down the page.
 
Marigold said:
Not ‘aimed’ at anyone, Dinosaw. Just an observation. I thought the photo was appropriate for a poultry forum!

In that case. Also not aimed at anyone.
 

Attachments

  • 4r95hq.jpg
    4r95hq.jpg
    112 KB · Views: 1,008
Deaths are not the only factor to consider. Influenza is known to cause long term effects, one of which is severe depression. The condition being called "Long Covid" has had very severe effects on a number of people, even those considered to be fit and healthy before catching Covid-19. There are cases of Covid-19 locally and our hospital trust has a very high incidence of hospital transmitted infection, but personally I think there is little chance of me catching it even without lockdown because I'm not very socially active. The riskiest place for me would have been in checkout queues and at any one of the three choirs with which I sang. That of course has been stopped.
The major difficulties faced by those trying to protect us are the wilful, selfish acts of people who ignore the restrictions; the Covid deniers or conspiracy theorists and the total lack of common sense shown by a large portion of the population.
 
I for one am waiting for the innoculation. The OH will get his before me, not sure how long I will have to wait, I'm in the next to last 'batch'. I am not one for jabs, but cannot see any other way out of this miserable existence. If I didn't have the countryside to walk in, I would go mad. I know some people don't want to be vaccinated, but there doesn't seem to be any other option. :-(
 
Marigold said:
The only trouble is - what’s the alternative?
Hopefully the series will pick up after week 3. I'm hanging on for eggs sometime and for Sayuri to make a new album along the way (she should have plenty of angst as fuel but I realise this a peculiar outlook.) Spring in the northern hemisphere will improve things a great deal!
 
Back
Top